1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 334 F.Supp.
  5. 334 F.Supp. 117 (1971)
 

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION. v. W. R. GRACE & COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 67-H-424.

334 F.Supp. 117 (1971)

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. W. R. GRACE & COMPANY and Pontiac Refining Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

Supplemental Memorandum August 4, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George B. Finnegan, Jr., Granville M. Pine and John A. Diaz, Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, Sanford M. Litvack, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, Ben G. Sewell, Sewell, Junell & Riggs, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

William K. Kerr and Herbert F. Schwartz, Fish & Neave, New York City, Palmer Hutcheson, Jr., Hutcheson, Taliaferro & Grundy, Houston, Tex., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NOEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, MOBIL OIL CORPORATION (hereafter Mobil) sued defendant, W. R. GRACE AND CO. (hereafter Grace) and defendant, PONTIAC REFINING CORP., (hereafter Pontiac) now a division of CHAMPLIN PETROLEUM COMPANY (hereafter Champlin) for infringement upon its product and process patent claims.

Pontiac and Champlin have moved the Court to sever the action against them from the one brought against Grace and thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases