1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 113 N.J.
  5. 113 N.J. Super. 333 (1971)
 

SANDLER v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF SPRINGFIELD TP.

113 N.J. Super. 333 (1971)

273 A.2d 775

RICHARD M. SANDLER, LEWIS N. SANDLER, AND SANDLER AND WORTH, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD, H.B. & F. REALTY CO., AND W.D. SNYDER & SON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 16, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Murray J. Laulicht argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys).

Mr. Andrew M. Epstein argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Epstein, Epstein, Brown, Bosek & Turndorf, attorneys).

Mr. Fred R. Gruen argued the cause for respondent Board of Adjustment of the Township of Springfield (Messrs. Gruen & Goldstein, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, adjoining property owners, appeal from a judgment of the Law Division that defendants H.B. & F. Realty Co. and W.D. Snyder & Son are entitled to a permit to build a restaurant on their resubdivided 28,182-square-foot lot notwithstanding municipal upgrading of minimum lot sizes for the zone in question by revision of the zoning ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases