1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 257 S.C.
  5. 257 S.C. 184 (1971)
 

IN RE WRIGHTEN

19316

257 S.C. 184 (1971)

184 S.E.2d 717

In The Matter of John WRIGHTEN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

November 10, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Irvin D. Parker, Asst. Atty Gen., of Columbia, for Complainant.

Messrs. Matthew J. Perry, of Columbia, Cleveland Stevens, of Conway, and Fred Henderson Moore, Aaron Harvey and Ernest G. Deveaux, of Charleston, for Respondent.

November 10, 1971.

Per Curiam:

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on a rule requiring the respondent, John Howard Wrighten, to show cause why a report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, finding him guilty of misconduct as an attorney, should not be confirmed and an appropriate disciplinary order issued. The complaint specified a number of instances during the period 1964-1969 in which respondent withheld, failed to account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases