STATE v. YORMARK


117 N.J. Super. 315 (1971)

284 A.2d 549

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MILTON YORMARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY PERWIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT B.J. MULVANEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. J.L. BRIZARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

October 5, 1971.

Decided November 30, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Raymond A. Brown argued the cause for appellant Milton Yormark (Mr. Irving I. Vogelman on the brief; Messrs. Brown, Vogelman, Morris & Ashley, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur J. Timins argued the cause for appellant Stanley Perwin (Messrs. Grinchis & Timins, attorneys).

Mr. Richard S. Lehrich argued the cause for appellant Robert B.J. Mulvaney (Mr. Matthew P. Boylan of counsel; (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys).

Mr. George P. Helfrich argued the cause for appellant J.L. Brizard (Messrs. Helfrich & Gallagher and Mr. George R. Sommer, attorneys).

Mr. David S. Baime and Mr. Alan Silber, Assistant Prosecutors, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief; Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, COLLESTER and MINTZ.


The opinion of the court was delivered by COLLESTER, J.A.D.

The four defendants appeal from their respective convictions, following a jury trial, of conspiracy to obtain money under false pretenses from the Maryland Casualty Company, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:98-1. Yormark and Perwin also appeal from their convictions on three-count indictments charging them individually with obtaining money under false pretenses from the Maryland Casualty Company, in violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases