COMMONWEALTH v. SCHULHOFF


218 Pa.Super. 209 (1971)

Commonwealth v. Schulhoff, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 23, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Atlee, Jr., with him John O. Shirk, Geisenberger, Zimmerman, Pfannebecker & Gibbel, and Barley, Snyder, Cooper & Mueller, for appellant.

D. Richard Eckman, Assistant District Attorney, with him Clarence C. Newcomer, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, and CERCONE, JJ.


OPINION BY MONTGOMERY, J., March 23, 1971:

The appellant, William K. Schulhoff, was tried before a jury and convicted on June 30, 1969, of the crime of possession of marijuana and hashish, and on this appeal he has raised, inter alia, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction.

The evidence presented by the Commonwealth was entirely circumstantial. The drugs were found on the early morning of January 18, 1969, by the Pennsylvania...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases