BETANCOURT v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APP. BD.

Docket No. 12737.

16 Cal.App.3d 408 (1971)

94 Cal. Rptr. 9

JESUS J. BETANCOURT, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD et al., Respondents; HOLLAND-AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 30, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

LeProhn & LeProhn, Eugene C. Treaster and Joseph S. Samuel for Petitioner.

Rupert Pedrin and Jon L. Gateley for Respondents.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold and Michael Laughlin for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

PIERCE, P.J.

In this mandamus proceeding petitioner Betancourt seeks an order compelling the Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board and/or its referee to comply with the provisions of rule 10832 of the board's Rules of Practice and Procedure.1

On May 8, 1969, petitioner injured his hip while lifting lumber in the course of his employment. His employer's compensation carrier was Holland-America...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases