1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 208 Kan.
  5. 208 Kan. 210 (1971)
 

URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO.

No. 46,082

208 Kan. 210 (1971)

491 P.2d 886

THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, and THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, Appellees, v. VINCENT V. LANE, Appellee, and NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed December 11, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Baska, of Kansas City, argued the cause, and Clarence H. Wood, of Kansas City, was with him on the briefs for the appellant.

Edward H. Powers, of Kansas City, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee Vincent V. Lane.

Donald E. Martin, of Kansas City, was on the brief for appellee Urban Renewal Agency of the city of Kansas City.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HARMAN, C.:

This action arises as an aftermath to a proceeding in eminent domain wherein appellant's application to share in the appraisers' award for the property taken was denied by the trial court.

On July 23, 1969, the Urban Renewal Agency of Kansas City, Kansas, and the city of Kansas City, Kansas, filed in the trial court their petition in eminent domain wherein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases