PER CURIAM.
This appeal by the defendant from his conviction of the crime of grand larceny presents the contention that he was denied due process of law in that counsel was not furnished to him at the time of a preliminary hearing, and that evidence presented at trial was insufficient. Upon consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we conclude that no reversible error has been shown. In our view the judgment was based upon sufficient evidence. Regarding...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
