W. MIFFLIN BORO. v. O'TOOLE


218 Pa.Super. 146 (1971)

West Mifflin Borough, Appellant, v. O'Toole.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 23, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Metz, Jr., with him Henry G. Beamer, and Richard G. Zeleznik, Borough Solicitor, for appellant.

Helen M. Witt, with her Edward A. Witt, and Cleland, Hurtt and Witt, for appellees.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, and CERCONE, JJ.


OPINION PER CURIAM, March 23, 1971:

Order affirmed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY MONTGOMERY, J.:

This case involves the vital question of when a municipality can be estopped from liening real property benefited by improvements made by it. I dissent from the action of the majority in affirming the lower court since, in my opinion, this is not a factual situation in which an estoppel can be invoked.

This is an action of Scire Facias sur Municipal Claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases