1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 332 F.Supp.
  5. 332 F.Supp. 26 (1971)
 

RYAN v. SPECTER

Civ. A. No. 70-2527.

332 F.Supp. 26 (1971)

Phyllis R. RYAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arlen SPECTER, District Attorney of Philadelphia, Defendant.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

August 27, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharon K. Wallis, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

T. Michael Mather, Asst. Dist. Atty., for defendant.

Before BIGGS, Circuit Judge, and JOHN W. LORD, Jr., and WEINER, District Judges.

OPINION

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

This suit, which names 1250 persons, among others, as plaintiffs, was brought as a class action and attempts to set up a dozen or more classes or subclasses pursuant to Rule 23, Fed.R.Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C., and presents difficult and puzzling questions of procedural and substantive law. On June 22, 1971, in a memorandum opinion, 321 F.Supp. 1109, 1110, we decided that we would not then apply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases