1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 181 S.E.2d
  5. 181 S.E.2d 173 (1971)
 

INGOLD v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

No. 715SC330.

181 S.E.2d 173 (1971)

11 N.C. App. 253

W. F. INGOLD v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 26, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stevens, McGhee, Ryals & Aycock by Karl W. McGhee, Wilmington, and Rives, Peterson, Pettus, Conway & Burge by W. Eugene Rutledge, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff appellant.

Poisson, Barnhill & Jackson by L. J. Poisson, Jr., Wilmington, Thomas E. Capps and Sherwood H. Smith, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant appellee.

GRAHAM, Judge.

In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand a motion for a directed verdict made by a defendant under the provisions of Rule 50, we are guided by the same principles that prevailed under our former procedure with respect to motion for nonsuit. Kelly v. International Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E.2d 396; Musgrave v. Mutual Savings & Loan Assoc., 8 N.C. App...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases