1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 262 Md.
  5. 262 Md. 90 (1971)
 

JOHNSON v. UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD.

[No. 420, September Term, 1970.]

262 Md. 90 (1971)

277 A.2d 5

JOHNSON ET AL. v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 11, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. White, with whom were Joseph L. Cymek and Harvey S. Levin on the brief, for appellants.

David J. McDonnell, with whom were Allen, Thieblot & Alexander, Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and William E. Brannan, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

As is the case in most instances where remedial legislation has been enacted, Maryland's Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, Code (1957, 1970 Repl. Vol.) Art. 66 1/2, subtitle 7, part VI (the Act) has given rise to a spate of litigation dealing with the question whether the requirements of § 7-620 of the Act, "`Hit-and-run' cases generally" have been met, Weber v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases