JACOBOSKI v. PRAX

No. 42097.

187 N.W.2d 125 (1971)

Ramona C. (Biniek) JACOBOSKI and Bernard A. Biniek, Appellants, v. Judith (Frelsieben) PRAX and Joseph Freisleben, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 7, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lais, Jacobowski & Bannigan, Mansur, Mansur & Mansur, and Robert E. Kenney, St. Paul, for appellants.

Murnane, Murnane, Battis, deLambert & Conlin, St. Paul, for respondents.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and MURPHY, ROGOSHESKE, KELLY, and ODDEN, JJ.


OPINION

DONALD C. ODDEN, Justice.*

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs' alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict or a new trial.

Plaintiffs' motion was based on two grounds: (1) The verdict was not justified by the evidence; (2) the trial court should have granted plaintiffs' motion for a directed verdict at the close of the testimony.

Plaintiffs' cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases