1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 15 Ariz.
  5. 15 Ariz. App. 296 (1971)
 

HANCOCK v. LINSENMEYER

No. 1 CA-CIV 1465.

15 Ariz. App. 296 (1971)

488 P.2d 501

Hulda R. HANCOCK, formerly Hulda R. Struges, Appellant, v. Otto LINSENMEYER, individually and as Alter Ego of Hulda Original Sales, Inc., and Hulda Original Sales Corporation, Arizona corporations, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

Rehearing Denied October 4, 1971.

Review Denied November 16, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller & Haggerty, by Philip M. Haggerty, Phoenix, for appellant.

Otto H. Linsenmeyer, and Gerald G. Eastman, Phoenix, for appellees.

STEVANS, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was the plaintiff in the Superior Court and the appellee was the defendant. The plaintiff secured a jury verdict and a judgment thereon in her favor in the sum of $225,000. The defendant's motion for new trial raised several issues including the assertion that the damage award was excessive. The trial court entered its minute entry order:

"* * * granting a Remittur [sic] in the sum of $175,000.00 in favor of the Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases