STATE v. HAYNES

No. 70-353.

25 Ohio St. 2d 264 (1971)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HAYNES, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 17, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James V. Barbuto, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Stephan M. Gabalac, for appellee.

Mr. James R. Willis, for appellant.


O'NEILL, C. J.

Appellant basically raises two issues in this case.

First, he contends that the affidavit for the search warrant did not set forth any grounds to show that the information furnished by the informer was reliable.

The affidavit in the present case recited that, on three separate, designated occasions over a three-week period, a named informant purchased marijuana on the premises and turned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases