1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 59 N.J.
  5. 59 N.J. 209 (1971)
 

IN RE FRIEDLAND

59 N.J. 209 (1971)

280 A.2d 183

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID FRIEDLAND, MICHAEL A. QUERQUES AND NORMAN ROBBINS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW OF NEW JERSEY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 27, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles M. Egan, Jr. argued the cause as Special Prosecutor (Mr. Charles M. Egan, Jr. and Mr. William R. Albrecht on the brief).

Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the cause for respondent Friedland.

Mr. Stephen B. Wiley argued the cause for respondent Robbins (Eileen M. Cornell on the brief).

Mr. Daniel E. Isles argued the cause for respondent Querques (Mr. Daniel E. Isles and Mr. Harvey Weissbard on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary action. On May 13, 1969, we appointed Superior Court Judge Alexander Waugh as a Master to hear certain charges against David Friedland, Michael Querques, and Norman Robbins, Attorneys at Law, involving an alleged improper arrangement for the dismissal of two criminal complaints filed in the Municipal Court of the Township of Woodbridge. The charges arose out of a loan sharking operation. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases