Per Curiam.
Appellant's first contention is that the board was without jurisdiction to set a tax assessment against 100% of the Sunbury inventory, since the only error alleged by appellant was the failure of the Tax Commissioner to eliminate the reported inventories at Sunbury when he allegedly substituted the "correct" taxable inventories at 10% and 7%.
R. C. 5717.03 sets out, in part, the effects of decisions by the board:
"The decisions of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
