PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery. MCLA § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.797).
His contention that the identification testimony was insufficient is without merit. At the trial a witness identified him as the holdup man, another witness placed him at the scene of the crime, and a third witness said he looked similar to the holdup man.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
