BIALAC v. HARSH BUILDING CO.

No. 26133.

436 F.2d 1381 (1971)

Sam BIALAC et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HARSH BUILDING CO., etc. et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 11, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Hillhouse, of Lewis & Roca, Flynn, Treon, Kimerer & Thinnes, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, MURRAH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The partial summary judgment is reversed. California law seems applicable. We believe that we have a situation where extrinsic evidence was admissible to determine what the intention of the parties was in their written papers. (Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage and Rigging Co. (1968) 69 Cal.2d 33, 69 Cal.Rptr. 561, 442 P.2d 641

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases