RUTGERS v. PILUSO


113 N.J. Super. 65 (1971)

272 A.2d 573

RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, PLAINTIFF, v. STEPHEN PILUSO, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, AND THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided January 11, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Clyde A. Szuch for plaintiff (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph Stevens for defendants Piluso and Piscataway Township (Messrs Roth & Stevens, attorneys)

Mr. Geza A. Stamberger, Jr., for defendant Board of Adjustment.


CONVERY, J.S.C.

This is an action in lieu of prerogative writs instituted by Rutgers, The State University (Rutgers), seeking a declaration that it is not subject to Piscataway Township's zoning ordinances. Pursuant to the provisions of the pretrial order, plaintiff moves for summary judgment on one of the counts of the complaint which seeks an adjudication of immunity. The Attorney General has been advised of this action and has previously received copies of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases