1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 18 Cal.App.3d
  5. 18 Cal.App.3d 155 (1971)
 

RAMSEY v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APPEALS BD.

Docket No. 10766.

18 Cal.App.3d 155 (1971)

95 Cal. Rptr. 558

PHIL RAMSEY, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, HUMKO PRODUCTS et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

June 16, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rose, Klein & Marias and Howard A. Gebler for Petitioner.

Rupert A. Pedrin, Gabriel L. Sipos, Kendig, Stockwell, Gleason & Allen and Joseph J. Gleason for Respondents.

OPINION

TAMURA, J.

Petitioner seeks review and annulment of a Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board (Board) decision holding that the penalty provided by section 5814 of the Labor Code may not be applied to an award of further medical care and treatment. The decision is challenged on two grounds: (1) the Board lacked jurisdiction to render the decision, and (2) the decision was erroneous on its merits.

This is the second time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases