1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 329 F.Supp.
  5. 329 F.Supp. 1396 (1971)
 

MORRIS BEAN & COMPANY v. REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 67-393.

329 F.Supp. 1396 (1971)

MORRIS BEAN & COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Alabama, W. D.

March 25, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leigh M. Clark, and Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner & Clark, Birmingham, Ala., William C. Conner, Truman S. Safford and Garo A. Partoyan, and Curtis, Morris & Safford, New York City, and James M. Parker, and Gary, Parker, Juettner & Cullinan, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Douglas Arant, and Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Birmingham, Ala. and Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., and Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, for defendant.

JUDGMENT ORDER

GROOMS, District Judge.

Plaintiff having moved for summary judgment on the basis of this Court's judgment in Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation and Morris Bean & Co. v. Stockham Valves and Fittings, Inc., D.C., 292 F.Supp. 893, (1) that Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 16 of U. S. Patent No. 2,991,267 and Claim 1 of U. S. Patent No. 2,914,823 are valid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases