CAPODANNO v. CAPODANNO


58 N.J. 113 (1971)

M. LILLEY CAPODANNO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROCCO T. CAPODANNO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 5, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph Schoenholz argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer & Kraemer, attorneys; Mr. Waldron Kraemer on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by PROCTOR, J.

The primary issue on this appeal is the propriety of the Chancery Division's denial of separate maintenance to the plaintiff M. Lilley Capodanno on the ground that her earnings were sufficient to meet her needs. The Appellate Division in an unreported opinion affirmed that part of the judgment of the trial court denying such relief and we granted plaintiff's petition for certification. 57 N.J. 134...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases