1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 491 P.2d
  5. 491 P.2d 1173 (1971)
 

MUSULIN v. WOODTEK, INC.

491 P.2d 1173 (1971)

Matt MUSULIN, Respondent, v. WOODTEK, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 22, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Bakkensen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland.

William A. Palmer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Casey, Palmer & Feltz, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, TONGUE, HOWELL and BRYSON, JJ.

McALLISTER, Justice.

This is an action on a promissory note in the amount of $80,000, executed in the name of defendant Woodtek, Inc., by Charles Bernert, defendant's general manager and vice president. Plaintiff is the payee. Woodtek defended on the grounds that there was no consideration for the note, and that Bernert was without authority to execute it. The trial was to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases