1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 334 F.Supp.
  5. 334 F.Supp. 1323 (1971)
 

BOWMAN v. HARTIG

No. 71 Civ. 1815.

334 F.Supp. 1323 (1971)

Sidney Z. BOWMAN and Knute Haig, Plaintiffs, v. Morris HARTIG et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

December 1, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Feldshus & Frank, New York City, for plaintiffs; by Sidney Feldshuh, Richard Weinberger, Wynne B. Stern, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Lehman, Rohrlich, Solomon & Heffner, New York City, for defendants; by Leonard H. Moche, Bernard K. Rothenberg, New York City, of counsel.

GURFEIN, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the action pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or, in the alternative, to require the plaintiffs pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e) to file a more definite statement.

The complaint contains six "causes of action." There is no diversity of citizenship. Jurisdiction is based on the existence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases