WATKINS v. WAKEFIELD

Patent Appeal No. 8488.

443 F.2d 1207 (1971)

Bruce J. WATKINS and Glenn D. Johnson, Appellant, v. Charles E. WAKEFIELD, Jr., Appellee.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

July 1, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Russell Hale, Christie, Parker & Hale, Pasadena, Cal., attorney of record, for appellant.

Roderick William MacDonald, Richardson, attorney of record, for appellee. Alan L. Potter, Plumley & Tyner, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and RE, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation.


BALDWIN, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Patent Office Board of Interferences was correct in holding that the junior party, appellants Watkins and Johnson, had failed to demonstrate "reasonable diligence" in reducing the subject matter of the involved counts to practice. 35 USC 102(g).

The five counts of this interference were copied by appellant1 from Wakefield's patent.2 They define...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases