1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 439 F.2d
  5. 439 F.2d 1176 (1971)
 

MUNOZ v. HAUK

No. 26587.

439 F.2d 1176 (1971)

Rosalio U. MUNOZ and Michael E. Tigar, Petitioners, v. Hon. A. Andrew HAUK and Hon. Jesse W. Curtis, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 17, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol K. Smith, Michael E. Tigar, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.

Joseph A. Ball, Long Beach, Cal., J. E. Simpson, Philip F. Westbrook, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents, appearing as amici curiae for respondents at the request of the State Bar of California.

Before DUNIWAY, ELY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This Petition arises out of United States v. Munoz, District Court No. 6540, a criminal proceeding in which Munoz is charged with having violated the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.App. § 451 et seq. To represent him in the criminal proceeding, Munoz sought the assistance of Michael Tigar, his co-Petitioner in this court. In June, 1969, Tigar was appointed acting professor of law at the University of California at Los Angeles When...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases