1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 20 Cal.App.3d
  5. 20 Cal.App.3d 132 (1971)
 

FLYING TIGER LINES, INC. v. TRUCK INS. EXCH.

Docket No. 28651.

20 Cal.App.3d 132 (1971)

97 Cal. Rptr. 621

FLYING TIGER LINES, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant; PACIFIC INTERMOUNTAIN EXPRESS COMPANY, Intervener and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

September 20, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Chris G. Gasparich and Raoul D. Kennedy for Intervener and Appellant.

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Paul H. Cyril for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant.

OPINION

CHRISTIAN, J.

Pacific Intermountain Express Company, a corporation (hereinafter PIE) appeals from a judgment determining that it is not entitled to indemnity from Flying Tiger Lines, Inc. (hereinafter Flying Tiger) in the event that PIE is required to bear the loss occasioned by an injury to a PIE employee caused by the negligence of a Flying Tiger employee.

The injured PIE employee, Ramirez, was struck by boxes which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases