SMITH v. ONE SUPER WILD CAT CONSOLE MACH.


488 P.2d 847 (1971)

Raoul P. SMITH, District Attorney for Umatilla County, Oregon, Respondent, v. ONE SUPER WILD CAT CONSOLE MACHINE, 1232, 973P, et al., Defendants, R. Whitey Schroth, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided September 21, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Raoul P. Smith, Dist. Atty., Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and THORNTON, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

Defendant, owner of 11 coin-operated "free play" amusement machines, appeals from an order setting aside a previous dismissal order entered by consent of the parties in proceedings by plaintiff, District Attorney for Umatilla County, to declare defendant's amusement machines public nuisances and forfeited.

The sole issue on appeal is: Did the trial judge have authority to set aside a previous but virtually contemporaneous order entered by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases