1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 356 F.Supp.
  5. 356 F.Supp. 924 (1971)
 

BLASDEL v. MULLENIX

No. C-70-591.

356 F.Supp. 924 (1971)

Cal R. BLASDEL, Plaintiff, v. James T. MULLENIX, Defendant.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma.

December 22, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Marcus Holcomb, Holcomb & Holcomb, Buffalo, Okl., and Peter B. Bradford and Reford Bond, McAfee, Dudley, Taft, Cates & Mark, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

Don Hamilton and Don J. Harr, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CHANDLER, District Judge.

This cause came on for trial and the Court having heard the evidence and considered the same, finds the facts and states the conclusions of law as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. That the plaintiff is a resident of the State of Oklahoma; that the defendant is a citizen and resident of the State of Texas; that there is diversity of citizenship; that the amount in controversy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases