1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 328 F.Supp.
  5. 328 F.Supp. 913 (1971)
 

RAWLINGS v. NATIONAL MOLASSES CO.

No. 65-592.

328 F.Supp. 913 (1971)

Frank N. RAWLINGS and Shur-Gro Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MOLASSES CO., a corporation, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C. D. California.

June 10, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richards, Harris & Hubbard, William D. Harris, Jr., Roger C. Clapp, Dallas, Tex., Lyon & Lyon, Roland N. Smoot, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Connolly, Bove & Lodge, William J. Wier, Jr., Wilmington, Del., Kaplan, Livingston, Goodwin, Berkowitz & Selvin, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID W. WILLIAMS, District Judge.

After much effort on their part, Philip C. Anderson and Frank N. Rawlings finally convinced the Patent Office that they were entitled to a patent on two claims and on May 29, 1956, they were issued patent No. 2,746,001 (hereinafter '001). It concerned a liquid food supplement for ruminant animals1 capable of being fed with roughage on a free-choice basis.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases