NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 85, IBTCWHA

No. 71-1293.

448 F.2d 789 (1971)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 85, IBTCWHA, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 14, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen Feldman (argued), Elliott Moore, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Duane B. Beeson, of Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

The proposed order of the Board will be enforced.

The decision of the Board is presently found at 186 NLRB No. 72.

The question here is whether the proposed order is overbroad. We find a propensity for secondary boycotts often accompanied by violence is well documented by the record and by incidents of which the Board and a court may properly take judicial notice. See, for example, Hoffman v. Local 85...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases