1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 328 F.Supp.
  5. 328 F.Supp. 808 (1971)
 

QUINCY COLLEGE & SEM. CORP. v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC.

No. 71 C 992.

328 F.Supp. 808 (1971)

QUINCY COLLEGE AND SEMINARY CORPORATION, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

June 21, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Harte, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

John E. Robson, David P. List, James L. Marovitz and Merle L. Royce, II, Leibman, Williams, Bennett, Baird & Minow, Chicago, Ill., for defendant National Railroad Passenger Corp.

R. T. Cubbage, T. G. Schuster and R. M. Gleason, Chicago, Ill., for defendant Burlington Northern.

Keith E. Roberts, Chicago, Ill., and Gordon P. MacDougall, Washington, D. C., intervenor, M. F. Radrizzi.

Before CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge, and PERRY and DECKER, District Judges.

DECKER, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of the discontinuance by the Burlington Northern Railroad of two trains operating between Chicago, Illinois and West Quincy, Missouri.

Plaintiffs are various charitable and municipal corporations which purport to represent all citizens of Macomb and Quincy, Illinois who are affected by the termination of railway service to and from Chicago. Until recently, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases