UNITED STATES v. DESKINS

No. 25929.

439 F.2d 684 (1971)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald E. DESKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 9, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald E. Wolfram, of Richmond & Wolfram, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.

N. Warner Lee, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

It is contended that because of prior service, the jury that tried Deskins was unsuitable. Deskins is concluded on this point by our Viramontes-Medina v. United States, 9 Cir., 411 F.2d 981.

Defendant at the trial on this Dyer Act case sought to inquire if local theft charges had been filed with reference to the car which had moved in interstate commerce. This was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases