MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants,
and
Dealers Transit, Inc., a corporation, et al., Intervening Defendants.
ASHWORTH TRANSFER, INC., a corporation, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants,
and
Dealers Transit, Inc., a corporation, et al., Intervening Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 13, 1971.
May 13, 1971.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Russell M. Allen, Norman E. Sutherland and William F. White, White, Sutherland & Gilbertson, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs Mitchell Bros. Transfer and others and Ashworth Transfer and others.
Keith E. Taylor and Gordon L. Roberts, Parsons, Behle & Latimer, Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiffs Ashworth Transfer and others.
Richard W. McLaren, Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for defendant United States.
Fritz R. Kahn, Gen. Counsel, Charles H. White, Jr., Atty., I.C.C., Washington, D. C., for defendant I.C.C.
Donald A. Schafer, Hardy Myers, Jr., Rives, Bonyhadi, Hall & Epstein, Portland, Or., for all intervening defendants.
James M. Doherty, Doherty & Robertson, Austin, Tex., for intervening defendant J. H. Rose Truck Line.
Max G. Morgan, Morgan, Dykeman & Williamson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for intervening defendant Tri-State Motor Transit Co.
Alan Foss, Van Osdel, Foss, Johnson & Miller, Fargo, N. D., for intervening defendant International Transport, Inc.
Robert E. Joyner, Wrape & Hernly, Memphis, Tenn., for intervening defendant Dealers Transit.
Before MERRILL, Circuit Judge, and SOLOMON and GOODWIN, District Judges.
United States District Court, D. Oregon.
OPINION
ALFRED T. GOODWIN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Mitchell and Ashworth brought these actions in Oregon and Utah respectively to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting four intervening defendants authority to transport "size and weight" commodities throughout various Western states. The challenged order is reported in Dealers Transit, Inc., Ext.—Eight Western States, 110 M.C.C. 317 (1969).
The two cases have...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
