ARTERBURN, Chief Justice.
On August 21, 1969, appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of Sale of Obscene Literature. Appellant moved to quash the indictment, alleging "that the statute on which this action was based Acts 1961, ch. 40, sec. 1, p. 70 (Burns 10-2803) [IC 1971, 35-30-10-1] is unconstitutionally vague and provides for constitutional censorship and invasion of privacy." The trial court overruled the motion, whereupon, the appellant entered...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
