1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 331 F.Supp.
  5. 331 F.Supp. 710 (1971)
 

BURLESON v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY

Civ. A. No. CA-3-3446-D.

331 F.Supp. 710 (1971)

Theo BURLESON, and His Wife, Geraldine Burleson, Plaintiffs, v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.

July 30, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phil Burleson, Abney, Burleson, Bondies, Conner & Mills, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs.

Mark Martin and Wilson Herndon, Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Martin & Unis, Dallas, Tex., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek recovery for breach of warranty. Defendant has moved to dismiss, claiming the statute of limitations has run.

About August 13, 1965, plaintiff Geraldine Burleson began taking Oracon birth control pills. She took the pills approximately six weeks, terminating their usage at the end of September.

On May 31, 1966, eight months after she stopped taking the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases