1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 341 F.Supp.
  5. 341 F.Supp. 699 (1971)
 

KLEIN v. H. N. WHITNEY, GOADBY & CO.

No. 70 Civ. 5778.

341 F.Supp. 699 (1971)

Ernest KLEIN, Plaintiff, v. H. N. WHITNEY, GOADBY & CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 22, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest Klein, pro se.

Denis B. Sullivan, New York City (Reavis & McGrath, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-Spear, Leads & Kellogg, James Crane Kellogg III and Raymond E. Grabowski.

James E. Massey, New York City (Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, New York City, of counsel), for defendants H. N. Whitney, Goadby & Co. and Thomas E. Wood.

MEMORANDUM

TYLER, District Judge.

In this, yet another of the endless suits of plaintiff Ernest Klein, defendants are testing his complaint by motions for summary judgment and similar relief. As is now common in the more recent of Klein's litigations, defendants' main contention is that these particular claims are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. I conclude that this action is so barred and that, there being no issue of fact with respect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases