FINGER LK. RAC. v. OFF-TRACK BET. COMM.


65 Misc.2d 946 (1971)

Finger Lakes Racing Association, Inc., Plaintiff, v. New York State off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission et al., Defendants, and City of New York et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Mid-State Raceway, Inc., Plaintiff, v. New York State off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission et al., Defendants, and City of New York et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc., Plaintiff, v. New York State off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission et al., Defendants, and City of New York et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Sullivan County Harness Racing Association, Inc., Plaintiff, v. New York State off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission et al., Defendants, and City of New York et al., Defendants-Intervenors.

Supreme Court, Albany County.

May 3, 1971


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General for New York State Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission and others, defendants. Schrade, Morris & Roche for Saratoga Harness Racing Association, Inc., plaintiff. Leonard J. Litz for City of Schenectady, defendant. William Jubic for County of Rensselaer, defendant. William D. Kiley for Mid-State Raceway, Inc., plaintiff. Raichle, Banning, Weiss & Halpern for Finger Lakes Racing Assn., plaintiff. Cooke & McBridge for Sullivan County Harness Racing, Inc., plaintiff. Charles Clay for County of Greene, defendant. J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel, for New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation and another, defendants-intervenors.


T. PAUL KANE, J.

Plaintiffs are four licensee race track operators which have commenced actions in Supreme Court, Albany County, against the New York State Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Betting Commission, New York State Racing Commission, New York State Harness Racing Commission, City of Schenectady, and County of Rensselaer, and in one action the County of Greene, seeking a declaratory judgment that chapters 143 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases