We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof we are convinced that if error occurred with respect to the introduction of a fingerprint card and testimony relating thereto it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence from which this appeal has been taken. Chapman v. State of California, 1967,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
COLEMAN v. STATE
No. 69-423.
230 So.2d 725 (1970)
Mary Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 4, 1970.
February 4, 1970.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael Sigman, Orlando, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
