HENDRIX v. RAY-SER DYEING COMPANY


462 S.W.2d 483 (1970)

James R. HENDRIX, Plaintiff-in-Error, v. RAY-SER DYEING COMPANY, Defendant-in-Error.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

December 11, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray Siener, Chattanooga, for plaintiff-in-error.

F. Thornton Strang, Strang, Fletcher, Carriger, Walker & Hodge, Chattanooga, for defendant-in-error.


OPINION

CHATTIN, Justice.

James R. Hendrix, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, has appealed to this Court from an adverse judgment of the trial court denying workmen's compensation benefits.

Ray-Ser Dyeing Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was engaged in the business of dyeing and processing man-made fibers, threads and yarn.

In carrying out its business, it was necessary to maintain a boiler to generate steam to heat the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases