CITY OF WATERTOWN v. HAGY

No. 10600.

177 N.W.2d 736 (1970)

CITY OF WATERTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Arthur HAGY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

June 16, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Loucks, Oviatt, Bradshaw & Green, Watertown, for defendant and appellant.

Dean Sumner, Watertown, for plaintiff and respondent.


HANSON, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty of violating an ordinance of the City of Watertown relating to the regulation and licensing of transient and itinerant photographers. On appeal he asserts the unconstitutionality of the ordinance. The City of Watertown failed to appear or file a brief in opposition.

The challenged ordinance is as follows:

"12.0301: LICENSE REQUIRED. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases