Judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, the proof presented an issue as to whether defendant was a seller of the heroin or merely the buyer's accomplice or agent in purchasing this narcotic. We believe the jury was warranted in finding that the proof established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was one of the sellers and was beneficially interested in the proceeds of the sale (cf. People v. Wright,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
