1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 478 P.2d
  5. 478 P.2d 384 (1970)
 

IN RE DIBBLE

478 P.2d 384 (1970)

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Dan DIBBLE, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided November 18, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

John A. Tujo, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the briefs was William H. Boland, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, DENECKE, HOLMAN, TONGUE, HOWELL and SCHWAB, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary proceeding against a member of the Oregon State Bar, arising from charges as alleged in two separate complaints and after a hearing on each complaint.

At the first hearing, held on April 23, 1969, evidence was offered that the accused had appeared on three separate occasions in the circuit court in Multnomah county before a judge who testified that, in his opinion, the accused was under the influence of intoxicating liquor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases