INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Southern Conference, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,
Robertson Tank Lines, Inc., Intervenor.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
ROBERTSON TANK LINES, INC., Respondent,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Southern Conference, Intervenor.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 20, 1970.
Decided June 30, 1970.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for petitioner in No. 23,466 and intervenor in No. 23,576. Mr. Raymond W. Bergan, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 23,466 and intervenor in No. 23,576.
Mr. William J. Avrutis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Mrs. Abigail Cooley Baskir, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in No. 23,466 and petitioner in No. 23,576.
Mr. W. D. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., for respondent in No. 23,576 and intervenor in No. 23,466.
Before LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges, and DAVIES, Judge, U. S. District Court for the District of North Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In our view there is substantial evidence to support the findings, conclusions and decision of the Examiner, accepted with slight modifications as those of the Board. That decision is reported elsewhere1 and there is no need to set out the facts and evidence again. The decision embodies a considered effort to assess the credibility and reliability of the testimony of the witnesses offered by the General Counsel. Their testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
