RILEY v. STATE

No. State 173.

47 Wis.2d 801 (1970)

177 N.W.2d 838

RILEY, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 1, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by John S. Schlom of Waupun.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Jeffrey B. Bartell, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.


BEILFUSS, J.

The sole issue is whether the imposition of a four-year sentence for defendant's conviction on escape was an abuse of discretion by the trial court.

In State v. Tuttle (1963), 21 Wis.2d 147, 124 N.W.2d 9, this court modified the rule regarding review of sentences and declared that it has the power to review of sentences within the statutory limits to determine whether an abuse of discretion clearly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases