1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 7 Cal.App.3d
  5. 7 Cal.App.3d 836 (1970)
 

CURRY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket Nos. 10135, 10145.

7 Cal.App.3d 836 (1970)

86 Cal. Rptr. 844

FLOYD WILSON CURRY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. ROLAND JACK HENDERSON et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

May 20, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Percy Foreman, James W. Tetley and James P. McGowan, Jr., for Petitioners.

James Don Keller, District Attorney, Richard H. Bein and Terry J. Knoepp, Deputy District Attorneys, for Respondent and for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

WHELAN, J.

Roland Jack Henderson (Henderson) and Linda Gail Henderson (Mrs. Henderson)1 moved under section 1538.5, Penal Code, to suppress certain physical evidence. Floyd Wilson Curry (Curry), a codefendant in the same criminal action, made a like motion. Both motions were denied in part.

The petitions for writs of prohibition have been consolidated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases