POPICH v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

Nos. 3757, 3758.

231 So.2d 604 (1970)

Joseph A. POPICH v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. H. Bennett FOX v. Joseph A. POPICH.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morphy & Freeman, A. D. Freeman, Jr., New Orleans, for Joseph A. popich.

Cox, Bagot & Huppenbauer, Michael H. Bagot and Henry L. Klein, New Orleans, for Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.

Cox, Bagot & Huppenauer, Michael H. Batot and Henry L. Klein, New Orleans and Emile E. Martin, III, Belle Chasse, for H. Bennett Fox.

Before REGAN, REDMANN and BARNETTE, JJ.


BARNETTE, Judge.

This is an action arising out of a building contract. The contractor seeks recovery of the balance alleged due from the owner under the terms of the contract. The owner seeks by way of reconvention against the contractor and by separate suit against the contractor's surety, recovery of an amount alleged necessary to complete the building and to correct the deficiencies caused by improper workmanship.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases