PER CURIAM.
Appellant has appealed a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of robbery. His primary contention is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilt and the judgment should be reversed.
We have carefully reviewed the evidence adduced at the trial and find from the testimony of the victim that she positively identified appellant as the man who robbed her on the night in question. This...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.