1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 6 Cal.App.3d
  5. 6 Cal.App.3d 815 (1970)
 

REES v. LAYTON

Docket Nos. 34935, 34947, 34997.

6 Cal.App.3d 815 (1970)

86 Cal. Rptr. 268

THOMAS M. REES et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. REX E. LAYTON, as City Clerk, etc., Defendant and Appellant. MAURICE D. RUTLEDGE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. REX E. LAYTON, as City Clerk, etc., Defendant and Appellant. CHRISTINA J. NEW, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. REX E. LAYTON, as City Clerk, etc., Defendant and Appellant. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

April 21, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones and Claude E. Hilker, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendant and Appellant.

Christina J. New, in pro. per., David M. Rothman, Barnet M. Cooperman and Stanley Rogers for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

SCHWEITZER, J.

These three cases present the identical question, the validity of section 91 of the Election Code of the City of Los Angeles,1 and have therefore been consolidated for purposes of appellate review. Section 91 of the city's Election Code provides in part: "A candidate who is running for the same elective office which he then holds shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases